Below is Page 1 of the Official Township Park FAQ

You can download this FAQ from Northfield Township's website.    (Or you can grab our copy.)

NorthVillage FactSheet 10-9-2017 page 1 900by1210 circled promise

How do you know when your Boardmembers aren't Liars? 

Simple. They keep their promises.

This lakeside park, a park of over half of the lakeside land purchased - was a promise.



“I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell.” ― Harry S. Truman





Aynes COCS Interview 2017 05 30 Slowed 1m53s

 - Steve Aynes exact words at at his 5/30/2017 job interview.


Do Trustees Jackie Otto, Tawn Beliger, and Janet Chick agree?  They must have!  They renewed his contract with only 45 seconds devoted to the vote, a 45 seconds which included and comprised the entirety of their public review of his job perfomance.


Banner AFT COCS graphs large art only cropped 900w50pct


AFT: Cost Of Community Services Study, 2016






Van Curler Crowdshot pic01 970w148h

Hello Neighbors:

The Board of Trustees is actively negotiating to sell off 80% of our new waterfront park for peanuts. This is a 21-acre jewel – the only vacant land left on the lake - and if the sale goes through, we will be left with less than four acres of park (minus roads, parking, bathrooms, etc.).

There will be no land left for the Fourth of July fireworks parking, the Pond Hockey Tournament, or mixed-use residential/commercial development that might be attracted downtown by the new beach and park.

This is not what residents told the Board we wanted. In two surveys, a supermajority of residents (60%+) said we wanted a “park only”. The Board hasn’t even done their homework to discover what a beach and park will cost to engineer, build, maintain and insure.

The Board is ignoring the residents; the Township Master Plan, the Downtown Strategic Action Plan, the North Village Plan and the Parks & Recreation Board recommendation in its haste to sell off land for 80-100 low-cost houses.

They say the new residents will revitalize downtown but have no facts or figures to support that claim.

Please sign our petition and put some public pressure on the Board to do its job.

We’ve only got one chance to get this right. Start with the beach and the park.

Northfield Neighbors


Giving Away Our Lakefront Park & Historic Firehall

Editorial by David Gordon March 3, 2020

Dear Reader:


I don't know for sure how best to rejuvenate downtown Whitmore Lake and I don't own a crystal ball and I don't have any expertise in urban renewal.  


What I do know is how to ask questions, do research, and let the evidence lead to common-sense conclusions.  It is unfortunate that often our Trustees fail to ask the important questions; especially this one: “Do we know this is what our residents really want?”


Urban renewal experts do exist and the Board should seek them out before taking irreversible action.  The Board also should reach out to the community for ideas and buy-in because there are thousands of smart, experienced people in Northfield Township who would help if they were sincerely invited to participate and their ideas were respected.  


That said, here’s “The Rest of the Story”.

Waterfront Park – Cliff Notes

• Our 23-acre waterfront park was assessed 5 years ago at $2.3M.
• The VanCurlers “gifted” it to the township for $330,000.
• Developer Livonia Builders offered $765,000 for 17 of 23 acres.
• The Board sent in their crack negotiators – Mgr. Steven Aynes and Planner Paul Lippens, to get $1.1M.
• The developer said “No.” Didn’t budget an inch.
• The Board is still moving forward at $765,000, claiming victory.

The majority of our Trustees (all Republicans), are possibly the worst negotiators ever; fiscal conservatives in name only willing to throwing away millions to satisfy their personal agendas and get reelected.

Everyone knows that when you’re making a deal, your bargaining power is only strong if you’re willing to walk away. Our Board negotiates like teenagers buying their first car.

EXAMPLE #1: Possible Loss of $1,000,000+

Nearly five years ago, the VanCurler family “gifted” their 23-acre waterfront property to the township for a song - about 15% of its assessed value. It is the only vacant land on Whitmore Lake.

The Board has been trying to figure out what to do with the property since their “Ribbon-Cutting” ceremony celebrating the “Community Park”. The residents, by a large margin (65%) and in two separate surveys, said they wanted a “Park Only”.

But instead of respecting the majority of residents, this Board (except for Zelenock and Dockett) decided to sell off 17 of the 23 acres for a 90-unit, low-end subdivision. The call it “progress” and say it will help revitalize downtown, but have no evidence to support their claim.

These five Board members declare that the money from the sale will pay for the park, again without evidence.

There are at least two serious problems with their claim - #1 They don’t know what the park will cost because they’ve done no studies for a park or a beach and #2 – residential development does generate extra tax revenue, but it requires more in services resulting in a net loss, not a net gain, in tax revenue.

Appallingly, the Board negotiated their deal without an attorney, a realtor or even an official assessment of the property.

They got an offer of $765,000 for 17 acres and they celebrated, even though the subdivision doesn’t match two separate “Board Approved” plans for the site. “A plan is only a plan,” explained Trustee Janet Chick. The ignored plans cost taxpayers about $50,000 to draft.

The manager’s office costs the taxpayers $125-1500,000/year. Planning costs us $60,000-$100,000/year. Maybe these guys are giving the Board solid advice and are being ignored. Maybe not.

It is interesting to note that two Trustees with decades of business experience (Treasurer Lenore Zelenock, a retired Ford Motor Co. finance executive, and Trustee Wayne Dockett, a long-time downtown shop owner) both voted against moving forward with negotiations.

Worst of all, the other five Trustees refuse to even send residents a letter telling them most of their park is being sold out from under them.

75 Barker Road Firehall “Fire Sale” Cliff Notes:

• The property was appraised for $230,000 two years ago.
• The township realtor listed it for $275,000.
• So, the Board voted to hold a “Special” meeting and to negotiate with only one potential buyer that is offering just $100,000.
• They are ignoring offers ranging from $425,000 to $600,000.

EXAMPLE #2: Possible loss of $500,000 in revenue.

The Board this week held a "Special" meeting to consider selling our shuttered firehouse at 75 Barker Road, which has been mostly vacant for nearly 20 years. Trustee Wayne Dockett is alone in opposing the sale.

The firehouse is one of the only historic buildings downtown and lots of people want to preserve it, especially the local Kiwanis Club, although some residents are ok with demolishing it.

Trustee Tawn Beliger (the one always whining that government wastes money) made the hurried motion to cut a deal. Supervisor Marlene Chockley seconded the motion. Here’s why.

1 – Chockley and Beliger are intensely anti-marijuana and the much bigger ($600k) offer was contingent on the buyer getting a pot license, which they don’t want to grant.
The Planning Commission recommended no distance limits at all on pot stores but the Board imposed a 500’ restriction.

2 - It's an election year and these Five Trustees desperately want to show they did something since 2016.

This really stinks.